PFO closure for migraine

Migraine is a primary headache dis­order that causes significant suffering in approximately 13 percent of the popula­tion of the United States. It accounts for an estimated $23 billion in annual cost to the economy through health-care expenses and lost productivity.

Two major features of migraine are migraine aura (MA) and headache. MA occurs in nearly one-third of migraine pa­tients and consists of one or more focal neurological symptoms that develop gradually over 5-20 minutes and persist for less than 60 minutes. MA typically precedes development of migraine headache.

Several years ago single-center retrospective analyses first reported an apparent association between partial or complete relief of migraine symptoms and transcatheter clo­sure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) for secondary stroke prevention (Reisman M, et al., 2005). The fora­men ovale normally serves as a one-way valve in the interatrial septum for physiologic right-to-left shunt in utero. Complete fusion of interatrial septae normally occurs by two years of age. When septae fail to fuse, how­ever, the PFO is a potential tunnel that can be opened by reversal of the interatrial pressure gradient. PFO is the most common form of right-to-left circulatory shunt (RLS).

Studies have shown that as many as 50 percent of individuals with MA will have a PFO, whereas PFO is present in about 25 percent of the general population and in migraineurs without aura (MO). In analy­ses performed by Swedish researchers, MA patients had a larger RLS than patients with MO, despite similar interatrial anat­omy (Jesurum JT, et al., 2007), and were about 4.5 times more likely to have greater than 50 percent reduction in migraine fre­quency following PFO closure (Jesurum JT, et al., 2008). These observations indicated a potential pathophysiological relationship between migraine and PFO.

The mechanism for this potential re­lationship is not understood, but investi­gators have focused on possible interatrial transit of vasoactive chemicals that bypass the pulmonary capillary bed, or on micro­emboli from the venous circulation which might trigger cortical spreading depres­sion and transient regional hypoperfu­sion. Migraineurs may have higher plate­let reactivity (Jesurum JT et al., 2010) or pro-coagulant state (e.g., protein C or S deficiency) than non-migraineurs, possibly resulting in greater load of microemboli in the arterial circula­tion. The brains of migraineurs may be more sensitive to circulatory changes than are the brains of those without migraine. The combination of potential triggers and susceptible neuronal substrate may result in an enhanced risk of MA among pa­tients with PFO.

The Migraine Intervention with STARFlex Technology (MIST) trial was a randomized trial of PFO clo­sure in migraine (Dowson A et al.). The failure of the trial to meet its primary endpoint (cessation of headache) and secondary endpoint (>50-percent re­duction in headache frequency and days) was surprising. Eligibility criteria for the trial may have excluded those patients who were most likely to benefit from PFO clo­sure. For instance, patients were excluded from MIST if they had a history of stroke or hypercoagulability, and subjects had to fit within a narrow range of headache fre­quency. If patients with a greater migraine burden or hypercoagulability were more likely to achieve meaningful reductions in headache frequency and severity, these exclusion cri­teria could have altered the study outcome.

Other trials are in progress or in the pipeline that may better elu­cidate the effect of PFO closure on migraine. The migraine-PFO asso­ciation offers opportunities for col­laboration between scientists and clinicians in both neurology and cardiology. The long-term goals of collaborative trials are improved quality of life and reduced cerebro­vascular sequelae for individuals who suffer from migraine.

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
  • Print